Procurement Package Specification
March 21, 2003
Subject: Opportunity to Participate in the Decontamination Equipment,
(Group B) (Reactor Cavity Scrubbers) Package No. 9-159-N221B
The Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO) is offering
companies from KEDO Member Countries an opportunity to participate in
the procurement of materials, components, and equipment for the construction
of its Light Water Reactor Project in Kumho, North Korea.
This particular opportunity is for the supply of decontamination equipment
(Group B). Interested companies who possess the technical capability,
production capacity, and financial stability to offer a competitively
priced product are encouraged to respond. KEDO will review the responses
from interested companies and compile a consolidated list of candidates.
This list will be forwarded to Korea Electric Power Corporation (KEPCO),
the Prime Contractor, with instructions to qualify these companies for
inclusion in their Pool of Qualified Suppliers.
Any company interested, and who deems themselves capable of being qualified
in providing decontamination equipment (Group B) is encouraged to complete
the enclosed brief corporate overview and return it with any additional
relevant corporate information to KEDO before the close of business on
May 12, 2003. A brief summary of the technical specification for this
procurement is enclosed to assist companies in making a determination
to participate.
This information is also posted on KEDO's Web Page at www.kedo.org.
Companies selected by KEDO to be considered for this procurement should
receive a qualification package from KEPCO around early July 2003.
If you have any questions regarding this opportunity, please feel free
to contact Mr. Soon nam Jung at (212) 455-0207.
Sincerely,
John B. Mulligan
Director, Project Operations Division
Attachments: Summary of PPI (1 page)
Brief Corporate Overview Form (2 pages)
Summary of PPI
SPEC NO. : 9-159-N221B
TITLE : Decontamination Equipment (Group B) (Reactor Cavity Scrubber)
PROCUREMENT SOURCE: OB QUALITY CLASS: S
FORECASTED ITT ISSUE DATE: December 15, 2003
FORECASTED CONTRACT AWARD DATE: January 31, 2005
FORCASTED INITIAL SITE DELIVERY DATE: June 30, 2007
Description
a. Safety Category: Non-Safety Related
b. Relevant Codes and Standards (in effect as of December 31, 1996):
· ASME B31.1
· NEMA MG -1
· Reg. Guide 8.8
· ASME NQA-11
c. Scope of Supply (for two 1000 MWe units)
· Reactor Cavity Scrubber 2 sets (1 set for each unit)
d. Design Requirements
The Reactor Cavity Scrubber will be used as needed to decontaminate the
reactor cavity following refueling operations.
· Reactor Cavity Wall Scrubber shall be provided WEPA wall scrubber
or equivalent.
· Reactor Cavity Floor Scrubber shall be provided WEPA floor scrubber
model RM3 or equivalent.
· Reactor Cavity Hand Held Scrubber shall be provided WEPA hand
held scrubber model RM20 or equivalent.
e. Technical Requirements
· Quality Assurance Program Manual
· Performance Test Report
Note: 1 The extent to which the QA requirements are to be applied shall
be consistent with the importance to nuclear safety of the item, service
or process. A graded approach, which can satisfy the necessary requirements
and ensure the required quality and safety, shall be used.
Brief Corporate Overview Form
Procurement Package No. 9-159-N221B
Vendor: Country1:
Note: 1 The nationality of a multinational corporation (a business organization
that is based in one State and has branches, subsidiaries, and plants
in other States) is the State in which the business unit signing the Subcontract
is located.
1) Demonstrated Quality - Provide a brief description of your quality
assurance program. Reference any applicable Regulatory Codes and Standards
certificates your company currently holds. Give examples of how your company
has demonstrated that it can produce the product in question to the quality
standards required, including any products for power plant applications.
Address any significant warranty work for these products in the last 5
years.
2) Capability to Produce the Product - Discuss the production capacity
of the facility that will make this product. Include the approximate percent
capacity that will be dedicated to this production and any other fabrication
scheduled for the facility during this time period (backlog). Describe
your company's technical (design, engineering, manufacturing) expertise
that will be in support of this production.
3) Demonstrated Schedule Performance - Give examples of schedule performance
for past manufacturing and delivery of similar products.
4) Company Stability - What is your company's financial status in terms
of Dun & Bradstreet ratings and financial ratios? Include a copy of
your company's annual report with your response.
|